iPad mini (6th generation) vs iPhone 17 Pro Max
iOS
iPad mini (6th generation)
88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPhone 17 Pro Max
75.7%speed held · 15 min · multi-threadiPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
88.4% against 75.7% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, iPhone 17 Pro Max 75.7%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 15 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | iPhone 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 15 min · multi-thread |
| 1.67 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.19 GIPS |
| 1.53 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.66 GIPS |
| 77% | Lowest 5-second average | 70% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | iPhone 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.2 | OS | iOS 27.0 |
More matchups
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.