iPad mini (6th generation) vs iPhone SE (2nd Gen)
iOS
iPad mini (6th generation)
88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)
84.1%speed held · 30 min · multi-threadiPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
88.4% against 84.1% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, iPhone SE (2nd Gen) 84.1%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 30 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | iPhone SE (2nd Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 30 min · multi-thread |
| 1.67 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 1.53 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.68 GIPS |
| 77% | Lowest 5-second average | 35% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | iPhone SE (2nd Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.2 | OS | iOS 26.6 |
More matchups
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPhone SE (2nd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation)92.2%
vs
iPhone SE (2nd Gen)84.1%
iPad Pro 12.9-inch (3rd generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.