iPad mini (6th generation) vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
iOS
iPad mini (6th generation)
88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadiPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
88.4% against 7.5% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · multi-thread against 5 min · 1 thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · 1 thread |
| 1.67 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.86 GIPS |
| 1.53 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.21 GIPS |
| 77% | Lowest 5-second average | 3% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.2 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.