THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad mini (6th generation) vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

iOS

iPad mini (6th generation)

88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

82.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load

88.4% against 82.3% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G 82.3%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad mini (6th generation) 88.4% Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G 82.3%
Throughput over time: iPad mini (6th generation) against Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G25%50%75%100%0:005:00Throughput over time: iPad mini (6th generation) against Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G25%50%75%100%0:005:00
iPad mini (6th generation)MeasureXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.67 GIPSFastest sample1.18 GIPS
1.53 GIPSSecond-half average0.97 GIPS
77%Lowest 5-second average79%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPad mini (6th generation)MeasureXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.2OSAndroid 16

iPad mini (6th generation) Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

More matchups

iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro81.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3% Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store