iPhone 11 Pro vs OBLUE A101
iOS
iPhone 11 Pro
55.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OBLUE A101
87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadOBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load
55.7% against 87.6% of full speed
Under sustained load
OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPhone 11 Pro 55.7%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 11 Pro | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.48 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.43 GIPS |
| 0.27 GIPS | Second-half average | 2.11 GIPS |
| 48% | Lowest 5-second average | 80% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 11 Pro | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 18.7.2 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.