iPhone 11 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
iOS
iPhone 11 Pro
55.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12
69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load
55.7% against 69.2% of full speed
Under sustained load
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) keeps 69.2% of its speed, iPhone 11 Pro 55.7%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 11 Pro | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.48 GIPS | Fastest sample | 1.44 GIPS |
| 0.27 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.08 GIPS |
| 48% | Lowest 5-second average | 63% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Serious |
The devices
| iPhone 11 Pro | Measure | Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) |
| – | GPU | Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 |
| iOS 18.7.2 | OS | Android 17 |
More matchups
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 75% higher overall
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.