THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 11 Pro

55.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

55.7% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 11 Pro 55.7%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 11 Pro 55.7% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 11 Pro against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 11 Pro against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 11 ProMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.48 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
0.27 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
48%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 11 ProMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 18.7.2OSAndroid 14

iPhone 11 Pro Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 9049.2% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 11 Pro55.7% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store