iPhone 12 vs OBLUE A101
iOS
iPhone 12
91.0%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
OBLUE A101
87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load
91.0% against 87.6% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPhone 12 keeps 91.0% of its speed, OBLUE A101 87.6%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 12 | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.43 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.43 GIPS |
| 1.30 GIPS | Second-half average | 2.11 GIPS |
| 79% | Lowest 5-second average | 80% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 12 | Measure | OBLUE A101 |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 26.5.2 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone 1291.0%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
iPhone 1291.0%
iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 1291.0%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load
OBLUE A10187.6%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.