THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 12 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 12

91.0%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load

91.0% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPhone 12 keeps 91.0% of its speed, Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 12 91.0% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 12 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 12 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 12MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.43 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.30 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
79%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 12MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.5.2OSAndroid 14

iPhone 12 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 1291.0% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs iPhone 1291.0% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1291.0% vs OBLUE A10187.6% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OPPO A5389.9% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store