iPhone 16 vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
iOS
iPhone 16
79.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPhone 16 holds its speed better under sustained load
79.9% against 74.7% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPhone 16 keeps 79.9% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 16 | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.17 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 1.73 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.60 GIPS |
| 79% | Lowest 5-second average | 56% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 16 | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.0 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPhone 1679.9%
vs
iPhone XR79.8%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 1480.1%
vs
iPhone 1679.9%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 14 Pro Max80.8%
vs
iPhone 1679.9%
iPhone 14 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation)80.9%
vs
iPhone 1679.9%
iPad Pro 11-inch (4th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.