THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) vs OPPO A53

iOS

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OPPO A53

89.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

74.3% against 89.9% of full speed

Under sustained load

OPPO A53 keeps 89.9% of its speed, iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3% OPPO A53 89.9%
Throughput over time: iPhone SE (3rd Gen) against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone SE (3rd Gen) against OPPO A5325%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)MeasureOPPO A53
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.56 GIPSFastest sample0.60 GIPS
1.16 GIPSSecond-half average0.57 GIPS
73%Lowest 5-second average82%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)MeasureOPPO A53
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 12

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) OPPO A53

More matchups

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1291.0% vs OPPO A5389.9% iPhone 12 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store