THERMOHAMMER Get the app

motorola edge 60 vs OBLUE A101

Android

motorola edge 60

95.1%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load

95.1% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

motorola edge 60 keeps 95.1% of its speed, OBLUE A101 87.6%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
motorola edge 60 95.1% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: motorola edge 60 against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: motorola edge 60 against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
motorola edge 60MeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
4.42 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
4.20 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
92%Lowest 5-second average80%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

motorola edge 60MeasureOBLUE A101
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 16OSAndroid 16

motorola edge 60 OBLUE A101

More matchups

iPhone 1394.7% vs motorola edge 6095.1% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1291.0% vs motorola edge 6095.1% motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load motorola edge 6095.1% vs OPPO A5389.9% motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs motorola edge 6095.1% motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store