THERMOHAMMER Get the app

motorola edge 60 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

Android

motorola edge 60

95.1%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load

95.1% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

motorola edge 60 keeps 95.1% of its speed, Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
motorola edge 60 95.1% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: motorola edge 60 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: motorola edge 60 against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
motorola edge 60MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
4.42 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
4.20 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
92%Lowest 5-second average81%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

motorola edge 60MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 16OSAndroid 14

motorola edge 60 Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 1394.7% vs motorola edge 6095.1% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1291.0% vs motorola edge 6095.1% motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load motorola edge 6095.1% vs OPPO A5389.9% motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs motorola edge 6095.1% motorola edge 60 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store