Nothing Phone (3a) Lite vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
Android
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
7.5%speed held · 5 min · 1 threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
7.5% against 74.7% of full speed · different test settings, see below
Under sustained load
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro keeps 74.7% of its speed, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite 7.5%. The runs used different settings (5 min · 1 thread against 5 min · multi-thread), so read the gap with care.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · 1 thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 2.86 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 0.21 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.60 GIPS |
| 3% | Lowest 5-second average | 56% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 16 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL33.5%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 13 mini73.0%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 13 mini holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 17 Pro Max75.7%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPhone 17 Pro Max holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad (9th generation)76.9%
vs
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite7.5%
iPad (9th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.