THERMOHAMMER Get the app

OBLUE A101 vs Xiaomi Mi 10T

Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Mi 10T

77.9%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

87.6% against 77.9% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, Xiaomi Mi 10T 77.9%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
OBLUE A101 87.6% Xiaomi Mi 10T 77.9%
Throughput over time: OBLUE A101 against Xiaomi Mi 10T25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: OBLUE A101 against Xiaomi Mi 10T25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
OBLUE A101MeasureXiaomi Mi 10T
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.43 GIPSFastest sample1.07 GIPS
2.11 GIPSSecond-half average0.85 GIPS
80%Lowest 5-second average68%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

OBLUE A101MeasureXiaomi Mi 10T
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 16OSAndroid 12

OBLUE A101 Xiaomi Mi 10T

More matchups

OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16 Pro85.5% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 12 mini78.0% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 1177.5% vs Xiaomi Mi 10T77.9% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store