Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) vs Xiaomi Pad 6
Android
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)
Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) · Mali-G1-Ultra MC12
69.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi Pad 6
88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load
69.2% against 88.2% of full speed
Under sustained load
Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) 69.2%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.44 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.70 GIPS |
| 1.08 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.62 GIPS |
| 63% | Lowest 5-second average | 81% |
| Serious | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) | Measure | Xiaomi Pad 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| Dimensity 9500 (MT6993) | Chip | – |
| Mali-G1-Ultra MC12 | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 14 |
More matchups
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE34,132
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 18% higher overall
HONOR 600 Pro49,080
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
HONOR 600 Pro scores 22% higher overall
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
vs
Xiaomi 17T23,022
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) scores 75% higher overall
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF)134,594
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)40,322
PC (12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700KF) scores 234% higher overall
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Google Pixel 5 holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.