Google Pixel 9 vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
Android
Google Pixel 9
68.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
68.6% against 74.7% of full speed
Under sustained load
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro keeps 74.7% of its speed, Google Pixel 9 68.6%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| Google Pixel 9 | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.85 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 0.58 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.60 GIPS |
| 58% | Lowest 5-second average | 56% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| Google Pixel 9 | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Android | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| Android 17 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
Google Pixel 968.6%
Google Pixel 5 holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.