THERMOHAMMER Get the app

HONOR 90 vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

Android

HONOR 90

49.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load

49.2% against 74.7% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro keeps 74.7% of its speed, HONOR 90 49.2%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
HONOR 90 49.2% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%
Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: HONOR 90 against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
HONOR 90MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
4.32 GIPSFastest sample0.81 GIPS
2.12 GIPSSecond-half average0.60 GIPS
39%Lowest 5-second average56%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

HONOR 90MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 15OSAndroid 16

HONOR 90 Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

More matchups

HONOR 9049.2% vs iPhone 11 Pro55.7% iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 600 Pro56.4% vs HONOR 9049.2% HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 968.6% vs HONOR 9049.2% Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load HONOR 9049.2% vs Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2% Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store