iPad mini (6th generation) vs iPhone 16e
iOS
iPad mini (6th generation)
88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
iOS
iPhone 16e
73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
88.4% against 73.5% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | iPhone 16e |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.67 GIPS | Fastest sample | 2.00 GIPS |
| 1.53 GIPS | Second-half average | 1.47 GIPS |
| 77% | Lowest 5-second average | 72% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Fair |
The devices
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | iPhone 16e |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | iOS |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.2 | OS | iOS 26.6.1 |
More matchups
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 572.5%
vs
iPhone 16e73.5%
iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.