iPhone 11 Pro vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
iOS
iPhone 11 Pro
55.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadXiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
55.7% against 74.7% of full speed
Under sustained load
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro keeps 74.7% of its speed, iPhone 11 Pro 55.7%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPhone 11 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 0.48 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 0.27 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.60 GIPS |
| 48% | Lowest 5-second average | 56% |
| Nominal | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPhone 11 Pro | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 18.7.2 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
HONOR 600 Pro56.4%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
HONOR 600 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
HONOR 9049.2%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
iPhone 11 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Google Pixel 968.6%
vs
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
Google Pixel 9 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone 11 Pro55.7%
vs
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition)69.2%
Vivo X300 Pro (Satellite Edition) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.