THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16e vs OBLUE A101

iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

73.5% against 87.6% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16e 73.5% OBLUE A101 87.6%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against OBLUE A10125%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16eMeasureOBLUE A101
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.00 GIPSFastest sample2.43 GIPS
1.47 GIPSSecond-half average2.11 GIPS
72%Lowest 5-second average80%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16eMeasureOBLUE A101
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6.1OSAndroid 16

iPhone 16e OBLUE A101

More matchups

iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store