THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone 16e vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone 16e

73.5%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

73.5% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone 16e 73.5%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone 16e 73.5% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone 16e against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone 16eMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.00 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.47 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
72%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone 16eMeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 26.6.1OSAndroid 14

iPhone 16e Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 16e holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone 16e73.5% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store