THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) vs Xiaomi Pad 6

iOS

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

74.3% against 88.2% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3% Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2%
Throughput over time: iPhone SE (3rd Gen) against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: iPhone SE (3rd Gen) against Xiaomi Pad 625%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.56 GIPSFastest sample0.70 GIPS
1.16 GIPSSecond-half average0.62 GIPS
73%Lowest 5-second average81%
FairHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)MeasureXiaomi Pad 6
iOSPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.0OSAndroid 14

iPhone SE (3rd Gen) Xiaomi Pad 6

More matchups

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load Google Pixel 572.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 1577.3% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone 15 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store