THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Xiaomi Pad 6 vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

82.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

88.2% against 82.3% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G 82.3%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2% Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G 82.3%
Throughput over time: Xiaomi Pad 6 against Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: Xiaomi Pad 6 against Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
Xiaomi Pad 6MeasureXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.70 GIPSFastest sample1.18 GIPS
0.62 GIPSSecond-half average0.97 GIPS
81%Lowest 5-second average79%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

Xiaomi Pad 6MeasureXiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 14OSAndroid 16

Xiaomi Pad 6 Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G

More matchups

iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OPPO A5389.9% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 15 Pro Max82.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 14 Pro81.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G82.3% Xiaomi POCO X6 Pro 5G holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store