THERMOHAMMER Get the app

iPad mini (6th generation) vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

iOS

iPad mini (6th generation)

88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
iOS

iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

74.3%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load

88.4% against 74.3% of full speed

Under sustained load

iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
iPad mini (6th generation) 88.4% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) 74.3%
Throughput over time: iPad mini (6th generation) against iPhone SE (3rd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:005:00Throughput over time: iPad mini (6th generation) against iPhone SE (3rd Gen)25%50%75%100%0:005:00
iPad mini (6th generation)MeasureiPhone SE (3rd Gen)
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
1.67 GIPSFastest sample1.56 GIPS
1.53 GIPSSecond-half average1.16 GIPS
77%Lowest 5-second average73%
FairHottest state reportedFair

The devices

iPad mini (6th generation)MeasureiPhone SE (3rd Gen)
iOSPlatformiOS
–Chip–
–GPU–
iOS 27.2OSiOS 27.0

iPad mini (6th generation) iPhone SE (3rd Gen)

More matchups

iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OPPO A5389.9% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% iPhone SE (3rd Gen) holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store