iPad mini (6th generation) vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
iOS
iPad mini (6th generation)
88.4%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadVS
Android
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro
74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-threadiPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
88.4% against 74.7% of full speed
Under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation) keeps 88.4% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%.
Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5 min · multi-thread | Test | 5 min · multi-thread |
| 1.67 GIPS | Fastest sample | 0.81 GIPS |
| 1.53 GIPS | Second-half average | 0.60 GIPS |
| 77% | Lowest 5-second average | 56% |
| Fair | Hottest state reported | Nominal |
The devices
| iPad mini (6th generation) | Measure | Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| iOS | Platform | Android |
| – | Chip | – |
| – | GPU | – |
| iOS 27.2 | OS | Android 16 |
More matchups
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
Xiaomi Pad 688.2%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OBLUE A10187.6%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
OPPO A5389.9%
OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load
iPad mini (6th generation)88.4%
vs
iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2%
iPad mini (6th generation) holds its speed better under sustained load
iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well
iPhone 16e73.5%
vs
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7%
Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load
Where does yours land?
Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.