THERMOHAMMER Get the app

OBLUE A101 vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

Android

OBLUE A101

87.6%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load

87.6% against 74.7% of full speed

Under sustained load

OBLUE A101 keeps 87.6% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
OBLUE A101 87.6% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%
Throughput over time: OBLUE A101 against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: OBLUE A101 against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
OBLUE A101MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
2.43 GIPSFastest sample0.81 GIPS
2.11 GIPSSecond-half average0.60 GIPS
80%Lowest 5-second average56%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

OBLUE A101MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 16OSAndroid 16

OBLUE A101 Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

More matchups

OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs OBLUE A10187.6% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 16 Pro85.5% vs OBLUE A10187.6% OBLUE A101 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store