THERMOHAMMER Get the app

Xiaomi Pad 6 vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

Android

Xiaomi Pad 6

88.2%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread
VS
Android

Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

74.7%speed held · 5 min · multi-thread

Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load

88.2% against 74.7% of full speed

Under sustained load

Xiaomi Pad 6 keeps 88.2% of its speed, Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%.

Throughput ribbonshare of full speed over time
Xiaomi Pad 6 88.2% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro 74.7%
Throughput over time: Xiaomi Pad 6 against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00Throughput over time: Xiaomi Pad 6 against Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro25%50%75%100%0:001:002:003:004:005:00
Xiaomi Pad 6MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
5 min · multi-threadTest5 min · multi-thread
0.70 GIPSFastest sample0.81 GIPS
0.62 GIPSSecond-half average0.60 GIPS
81%Lowest 5-second average56%
NominalHottest state reportedNominal

The devices

Xiaomi Pad 6MeasureXiaomi POCO X7 Pro
AndroidPlatformAndroid
–Chip–
–GPU–
Android 14OSAndroid 16

Xiaomi Pad 6 Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro

More matchups

iPad mini (6th generation)88.4% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OBLUE A10187.6% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well OPPO A5389.9% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% OPPO A53 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone 13 Pro Max86.2% vs Xiaomi Pad 688.2% Xiaomi Pad 6 holds its speed better under sustained load iPhone SE (3rd Gen)74.3% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Dead heat: both hold their speed equally well iPhone 16e73.5% vs Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro74.7% Xiaomi POCO X7 Pro holds its speed better under sustained load

Compare any two devices

Where does yours land?

Run the benchmark on your own device and compare it with either of these in the app.

Get it onGoogle Play Download on theApp Store Windows: on its way to the Microsoft Store